Need An Eitzah is a free frum Jewish question and answer site. You can ask anything you want so long as it relates to Jewish life in some way. Questions do not have to be Halacha based, and can even be based on the way our society is today. Questions can also be of any topic under the sun, as long as the point of asking it here would be to get a chareidi point of view on the matter. So now that you understand, ask away!
about | faq | contact us | login | register
Need An Eitzah Logo

Is it true that Paroah was only an Amoh high?

Votes

+

1

-

Where does it say that Pharoah was only an Amoh high but due to his powers of charisma coupled with strong witchcraft he became the leader?


permalink


    Hello Shteiging, welcome to Need An Eitzah. Thanks for your question, please stick around! - Yehuda HaMaccabiJan 28  '13 at 18:00
reply

Have you got a comment on this post? Registering takes about 20 seconds and does not require email activation. Registered users have the ability to comment.


Add Comment
Hit enter to submit the form!
Minimum of 10 letters per comment!


1 answer!

Votes

+

2

-

A source of his height being 1 "Ammoh", is the Talmud (Moe'd Kattan 18a).

The Talmud also states there, that Pharoah was a magician.

There is no mention there that Pharaoh used his magical powers to coerece the populace to be subservient to him. However we know from other sources that Egypt was the "magic capital" of the world, where even young children were able to perform real magic. As such, it would be expected that their leader should be a superb expert in performing magic.

There are those who understand the above source as metaphorical. See Maharal (Be'er Hagolah, Be'er 5:8), Sh'lah.


permalink


    That was a quick answer! - Yehuda HaMaccabiJan 28  '13 at 18:01
reply
    Nice sources! I wonder if Eygption history books have something about tiny kings - Shmuel YaacovsonJan 29  '13 at 21:47
reply
    Its theoretical absence in history books wouldn't be of any concern to me in the least, as I pointed out above that there are respected mainstream commentators who understand the above source as metaphorical. However I also wouldn't be surprised if I saw it in some history book, since Chazal have already mentioned this. - Webbe RebbeJan 31  '13 at 21:16
reply

Have you got a comment on this post? Registering takes about 20 seconds and does not require email activation. Registered users have the ability to comment.


Add Comment
Hit enter to submit the form!
Minimum of 10 letters per comment



You do not have to register to answer this question. Just choose a username and start writing!

Login or just sign your name here:
You may optionally leave your email address which will enable you to recover your account if you ever log out:


Your Answer





As this is your first post, we need to confirm that you are indeed a human! Just type the letters you see into the box and you hopefully wont see this box again!



help



www.needaneitzah.com reserves all rights!   © 2024


Web Development & SEO | Pixeleague